Tuesday, October 1, 2019

Third Email to Board of Trustees

This email was sent to each individual AISD Trustee.

Dear Trustee xxx; 

I am writing to you today regarding the recent AISD Proposal for School Changes. This is the third of several messages which I will be sending to you on this topic. Each message will focus on one specific area which I hope will enable you to read and consider this information carefully. 

However the action which I will be requesting will be consistent in each of my messages. That is for the AISD Board of Trustees to unequivocally state that they will defer any decision on the proposed school changes until: necessary detailed information has been made available; the community has ample opportunity for authentic engagement; other school scenarios are considered; and the diversity and economic disadvantage of student populations at schools recommended for closure are considered in the school change decision making. 

This message focuses on the difference between “equitable access” versus justice. While “equitable access to 21st century learning environments” seems like a desirable goal, is this goal a reason to subject large numbers of students to uprooting from their neighborhood schools? Is the pursuit of this goal worth continuing the pattern of disregarding the needs and desires of the historically segregated and disenfranchised area of Austin located East of I-35? I think not.

When the task force process resulted in the recommendation to close 12 schools, the majority of which are located East of I-35,  9 of which are Economically Disadvantaged schools, and 11 are Majority Minority why didn’t these facts raise a RED FLAG to the task force and the AISD Administration? 
The potential for harm to the students and communities who attend and support these majority minority and economically disadvantaged schools should have STOPPED these recommendations before they were made public. This evident lack sensitivity tends to invalidate the entire process and damages the credibility of AISD as a whole.

Furthermore of the 80,000 students in the district almost 11% will be either relocated or have large numbers of new students added to their current school.  Over 50% of the elementary students in East Austin schools will be either relocated or have large numbers of new students added to their current school! (See bellow)
There is very little evidence that relocating underperforming students to high performing schools improves the relocated students performance. To the contrary the experiences of Chicago, Philadelphia and Washington DC have shown that significant problems result including; lost student records; less access to special needs programs; increased emotional issues among the relocated students; and further decreased attendance in the school district.

AISD’s proposes to relocate many elementary students to other schools some of which are 2 or more miles from the current school.  AISD offers busing as a solution to those affected students and parents.  Should AISD even consider adding the burden of taking a bus to and from elementary school for children in K to 3 grades? Instead of being walked to school by their parents and met at the end of the day by a familiar face, we expect these kids to be at a specified location at a specified time and spend significant amounts of their day in non-air-conditioned vehicles without safety belts!

AISD must also consider the effect of school closure on the local communities. Most of these schools have a long history and are keystone community instituitions.  Closing neighborhood schools disrupts and further destabilizes communities that are already burdened with other forms of instability.

Now let’s address the issue of old buildings which need substantial maintenance and therefore cost more to operate.  Most of the schools recommended for closing have a substantial list of deferred maintenance issues. Many of these maintenance issues were to be addressed by the 2017 AISD bond issue.  However, almost none of these project have been initiated with AISD’s focus instead on building new schools.  The Task Force now cites the poor condition of many of the selected campuses as one of the main reasons for their closure!  Is this not the classic example of a self-fulfilling prophecy!

In fact in recent meeting with parents of the schools to be closed, AISD has justified not fixing air-conditioning and other in school maintenance needs by citing the imminent closing of the schools.  This type of neglect is another example of the level of AISD’s insensitivity. These schools will be operating for another 2-4 years and JUSTICE demands that the committed repairs be made for the sake of the students who will continue to attend.

Several of the schools selected for closure show strong academic programs at or above the average of the district as a whole. Some of these schools also have the kind of racial and economic diversity that the district is supposedly striving for. Presumably they made the closure list because of facilities problems.  We know how to fix maintenance and building issues—  it just takes money and time. We do not know how to create or transfer a diverse environment with a successful learning culture

Now to address the “structural deficit” that AISD faces which is also used to justify the School Changes.  There is no doubt that the district population is decreasing; and that some schools are under utilized and inefficient.  However, does a 2% deficit on a $1.6 billion budget justify massive disruption of the entire school district? This is it a problem that should not require radical reorganization to solve.

In summary, it is not fair or just to expect the already disadvantaged areas of Austin to bear the brunt of “School Changes” no matter how well intentioned. 
Justice demands more than equal treatment. In the case of AISD it demands sacrifice and NOT by the historically underfunded and neglected areas of the City.

Finally I am compelled to note that AISD’S current course of action is likely to lead to several unintended but predictable consequences:

  • dramatic loss of support for public schools throughout Austin
  • skepticism which will hinder the success of AISD future bond issues
  • increase in enrollment in Charter Schools
  • increase in out migration to suburban neighborhood schools
  • exacerbation of the divide between minority and lower income East Austin and and the  better off areas of Austin
  • possible court challenges which the Texas Legislature will use to promote their anti-public school agenda

While I can fully appreciate the desire of the board of trustees to support the administration and it's task forces and not second-guess the results of their well-intentioned work, this is a critical time for AISD and the residents of Austin. In this critical time the board of trustees must not be afraid to exercise leadership to ensure this difficult situation does not become a disastrous one.
I look forward to your positive response to my request for postponing any action on the School Changes proposal until the actions listed above are completed. 

Peace and love, 
Stephen Dock 
1803 E 40th St Austin, TX 78722 


Screen Shot 2019-10-01 at 2.47.53 PM.pngScreen Shot 2019-10-01 at 2.48.28 PM.png

Monday, September 30, 2019

Second EMAIL to AISD board of trustees

The following letter was sent to the ASD board of trustees:

Dear Trustee xxx; 
I am writing to you today regarding the recent AISD Proposal for School Changes. This is the second of several messages which I will be sending to you on this topic. Each message will focus on one specific area which I hope will enable you to read and consider this information carefully. 
However the action which I will be requesting will be consistent in each of my messages. That is for the AISD Board of Trustees to unequivocally state that they will defer any decision on the proposed school changes until: necessary detailed information has been made available; the community has ample opportunity for authentic engagement; other school scenarios are considered; and the diversity and economic disadvantage of student populations at schools recommended for closure are considered in the school change decision making. 
While I'm sure all the members of the task force and administrators who worked with them acted in good faith to develop this proposal, I have substantial concerns in the area of AISD finances and their relevance to this proposal.
The first area of concern is the 2017 AISD Bond issue and whether AISD has faithfully acted to fulfill its commitments to the schools identified for closure.  Or has the district administration inadvertently acted in a “Bait and Switch” manner with regard to using the voter approved funds. 
Each of 12 schools proposed for closure has a page in the 2017 AISD Bond Issue book which was used extensively in the campaign to approve the $1.1 billion bond package. Each page describes significant and substantial upgrades and or maintenance commitments for that school. While I only have direct knowledge of one of the targeted schools, I suspect that many of the 12 have not had the upgrades or maintenance performed as committed in the bond issue.
I believe this is a significant issue as it raises into question the credibility of AISD and therefore casts substantial doubt on the entire school changes process. A likely consequence of this challenge to AISD’s credibility will be significant difficulty in approving any future bond issues.
If the Board of Trustees has access to information showing what bond funds have been expended since 2017 by school that may help to address this concern. If the data shows that the commitments to these schools have not been acted upon, then the AISD Board has a moral and possible legal responsibility to find out why.
The second area of concern is the changing Financial situation of AISD. My understanding is that the rationale for initiating the School Changes review process was based in large part upon a perceived structural deficit that AISD was facing along with declining student enrollment trends.  The structural deficit is frequently given as a major reason for the urgency behind taking action on the task force recommendations.
However I question whether this urgency still applies in fall of 2019. The Texas state legislature has passed SB3 which will materially affect the total dollars available to the district. Also the total taxable property value available to AISD is moving on an opposite trend to enrollment and has been growing at 7 to 10% per year.
Given these facts, AISD needs to show the community that the premise of the structural deficit is still valid. Has the AISD finance department provided the board of trustees with an updated five year revenue and expense forecast that takes into account SB3 and increasing tax ratables? If not I strongly suggest that the board request this update as soon as possible.
While I can fully appreciate the desire of the board of trustees to support the administration and it's task forces and not second-guess the results of their well-intentioned work, this is a critical time for AISD and the residents of Austin. In this critical time the board of trustees must not be afraid to exercise leadership to ensure this difficult situation does not become a disastrous one.
I look forward to your positive response to my request for postponing any action on the School Changes proposal until the actions listed above are completed. 
Peace and love, 
Stephen Dock 
1803 E 40th St Austin, TX 78722 

Sunday, September 29, 2019

2017 Bond Issue

The AISD 2017 Bond Issue was approved by 72% of the voters. It totaled $1.1 Billion and included something for every school in the district!

What has AISD done in the two years since the Bond Issue was approved to fulfill its commitments to the twelve schools proposed for closure?


Friday, September 27, 2019

Data- How enrollment numbers stack up in the consolidation scenarios?


This analysis was performed by Scott Lucas, based on 2018-2019 demographic analysis provided by Templeton Demographics. AISD mentioned at today’s meeting at Maplewood that it uses Templeton Demographics for its analyses.

Maplewood is the only school slated for closure that exceeds capacity currently and a consolidation with Campbell results in a significant exceedance beyond current capacity.  AISD has expressly stated in multiple forums that any additional facility needs would require future bonds.

List serve to save our east side schools

https://mailchi.mp/0587eb669723/getting-involved-in-saving-our-schools

AISD District Meeting 
Tomorrow, Saturday
Austin High
12PM

Letter to Austin Chronicle Sept 20 2019

Dear Editor,

Maplewood Elementary has the diversity profile of a perfect Sesame Street school. With 50% children of color, 34% economically disadvantaged children, 14% special education enrollment, a dual-language program, and children of refugee families, Maplewood is one of the most diverse schools in the district. In addition, Maplewood has been an Anti-Defamation League “No Place for Hate” campus since 2013.
    
With 140% enrollment, Maplewood runs counter to Austin's declining public-school enrollment. With creative and relevant special initiatives, a wide variety of grants, ecological and gardening programs that take the kids outside, “Peace Fests” every nine weeks, innovative community-partnered arts programs, a high walkability score, robust community involvement, a rocking PTA, and dedicated staff, Maplewood is a model of what a school can and should be.

 For several years Maplewood has been awarded the Mayor’s Healthiest School Award, and this year was the only AISD school at the elementary level to score in the top three, earning a $1,000 grant. 
    
The popular Cherrywood Art Fair sprang from Maplewood and is still held there. The highly respected Chula League Big Artist, Little Artist program is a spin-off of the special synergy of Maplewood Elementary and its neighborhood.
   
 Maplewood’s many accomplishments and strengths are a result of the hard work and dedication of our students, educators, volunteers, and generous community that has supported it even when AISD resources were scarce.
   
 Shouldn’t AISD be studying how Maplewood has become such a successful school rather than closing it down? Doesn't it make more sense for AISD to support this flourishing school, learn from it, and utilize the lessons learned to vitalize other schools in the district?

Iumi Richard-Crow

Page from 2017 AISD Bond Issue

This page was part of the site : https://austinisd2017bond.org/school-list/. which was used to promote support for the 2017 AISD Bond vote.





Resolution of Schieffer Willowbrook Neighborhood Association

The following resolution was unanimously adopted by the Schieffer Willowbrook Neighborhood Association of Sept 26, 2019:


Resolution in support of Maplewood elementary school, and East Austin Schools September 26, 2019.

Whereas Maplewood Elementary School is a community asset that is a foundation of our neighborhood; and

Whereas Maplewood Elementary School has a diverse student population; and

Whereas one of the goals of the Austin ISD school change report is to encourage "...a future where diverse student populations... enrich the overall learning environment for all students"; and

Whereas Austin ISD did not conduct community engagement with most of the school communities that are recommended for closure before the recommendations were released, including Maplewood Elementary; and

Whereas 74% of the students affected by the Austin ISD school closure recommendations are economically disadvantaged and 8 of the 12 schools recommended for closure serve East Austin students; and

Whereas Austin ISD has not provided the public with clear and detailed information about how the schools selected for closure were selected; the total cost savings by campus; future boundary changes that will affect attendance zones; over enrollment that will result from school consolidation; and future use of school properties; now therefore,  be it

Resolved that the Austin ISD Board of Trustees delay the decision about school closure and consolidation until additional information is available; the community has ample opportunity for authentic engagement; other school scenarios are considered; and the diversity and economic disadvantage of student populations at schools recommended for closure are considered in the school change decision making process.